Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paula Duvall's avatar

I don’t like lying, but Dostoevsky might be on to something through Razumikhin stating that lying is what makes us human. Everyone lies to some extent. There are white lies, regular lies, and villainous lies. But not only humans lie—animals, too. Male birds pretend to be injured to lure cats away from the nest, etc. Perhaps lying is what defines a certain level of consciousness.

This book seems to have nothing that makes it a pleasure to read but yet I read. It is like totally chaotic painting with no place to rest the eye and no focal point and yet I stand in front of it mesmerized. The first time I read this book I hated it and only finished so I could say I had read it. With your insights, I find the book amazing. I joined this read along just because I wanted to find out why such an annoying book was a classic. I am finding out!

Dunya is the only character that does not make me wince. Even the mother seems to border on hysterical.

Expand full comment
Chris L.'s avatar

1) I'm not sure what it is I like about the novel. The psychological underpinnings are still perplexing at this stage. The plot is interesting but not riveting. The characters are generally unlikable except for Dunya and I feel sorry for her mother. The symbolism would totally go over my head if not for your summaries. And yet, somehow, the sum is far greater than the parts, and I find it compelling?!

2) Ultimatums always go well. Right?

3) I was counting on Razumikhin to be a voice of reason for Rodion, but he's turing out to be...an odd fellow himself...

4) 43-year olds then seem so much older than they do today!

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts